- x NeonPulse | Future Blueprint
- Posts
- 🤖 AI Giants Train Models with YouTube Content Without Consent
🤖 AI Giants Train Models with YouTube Content Without Consent
Neon Pulse Team
July 17, 2024
Good morning and welcome to the latest edition of neonpulse!
Today, we’re talking about why many content creators are at odds with AI companies 👀
AI Training with YouTube Videos Sparks Controversy
Recent investigations by Proof News have uncovered an alarming practice among some of the world's leading AI companies, including Apple, Nvidia, and Anthropic. These companies have been found to use content from thousands of YouTube videos—totaling over 173,536 videos from 48,000 channels—to train their AI systems. This content includes subtitles from various sources ranging from educational channels like Khan Academy to entertainment like "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert."
This practice has ignited a significant debate about the ethics of AI training data acquisition, especially as it appears these companies did not seek permission from the content creators, violating YouTube’s terms of service. Creators like David Pakman, whose political commentary channel contributed nearly 160 videos to this dataset, expressed deep concerns about the unauthorized use of their content. Pakman, along with other creators, argues that if companies profit from their content, creators should be compensated.
The situation is complicated by the lack of transparency from AI firms about their data sources. For instance, the controversial dataset known as the Pile, which includes YouTube Subtitles among other sources, has been utilized by big tech companies to enhance their AI models, as detailed in their various research papers.
The response from the AI community has been varied. Some justify the use under the guise of 'publicly available data,' while others, like the creators affected, view it as outright theft and a potential threat to their livelihoods. The debate extends to the broader implications for content creators, especially with the increasing capability of AI to generate competing content.
As the conversation around AI ethics continues to change, it's clear that the industry faces a critical need for clear guidelines and perhaps a new framework for the ethical use of data in AI training. This scenario not only poses questions about legality and ethics but also about the future of content creation in the AI age.
Should AI companies compensate creators for using their content in training data? |
Cool AI Tools
🔗Ariglad: Powered by AI, Ariglad automatically updates your knowledge base articles, and creates new articles by analyzing support tickets and product release notes.
🔗Wanderboat AI: Travel + outing AI companion to find and sort the best point of interest with videos, images, and insights. From signature dishes to photo spots, you can ask questions freely in-chat, in-document, or on-map for personalized experiences.
🔗BuilderKit: Highly modular NextJS AI Boilerplate that allows you to ship an AI App super fast.
🔗MindPal: Build any internal AI tool in 5 minutes.
🔗Rapport Self Service: Combine all of the building blocks necessary to create, animate, and deploy your own Virtual Interactive Personality (VIP).
And now your moment of zen
Source: Ancient kingdoms
That’s all for today folks!
If you’re enjoying neonpulse, we would really appreciate it if you would consider sharing our newsletter with a friend by sending them this link:
Looking for past newsletters? You can find them all here.
Working on a cool A.I. project that you would like us to write about? Reply to this email with details, we’d love to hear from you!
https://neonpulse.beehiiv.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER